Every medical bill in a California injury case carries two numbers, and the law uses the smaller one. Under Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc. (2011) 52 Cal.4th 541, your past medical damages are measured by what was actually paid or still owed for your care, not by the sticker price the hospital printed. This guide explains the rule the way we explain it to clients: what the Supreme Court decided, how it changes the math depending on who paid your bills, and where the real value in a serious case actually lives. The Vertanous Firm has recovered more than $60 Million for injured Californians, including a $22.6 Million jury verdict, and every one of those cases was built on the real numbers.
The Starting Point
Look at any hospital bill that passed through a health plan and you will see two numbers. The first is the charge: the full amount the provider billed. The second is what the provider actually accepted as payment in full, which is almost always far less, because health plans negotiate rates with hospitals and doctors in advance. The difference between those two numbers is written off. Nobody pays it. The hospital never expected anyone to.
For years, injured plaintiffs in California argued that they should recover the first number, the full charge, from the person who hurt them. The reasoning was that the defendant should not benefit from the plaintiff's insurance. In 2011, the California Supreme Court settled the question in Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc. (2011) 52 Cal.4th 541, and the answer was the second number. Your recovery for past medical expenses is measured by what was actually paid or is still owed for your care. The written-off difference is not recoverable, because it was never a loss you suffered.
That one rule reshapes how every California injury case is valued, and most injured people have never heard of it until an adjuster uses it against them. This guide fixes that. It lives beside our page on what a car accident case is actually worth, which walks every component of damages, and under our complete Pasadena car accident lawyer guide.
The Case
The facts were ordinary, which is why the case matters so much. Rebecca Howell was seriously injured in a collision with a company truck and underwent spinal surgery. Her medical providers billed their full charges. Her health insurer paid them under its negotiated rates, the providers accepted that payment as payment in full, and the rest was written off. At trial she recovered the full billed amount, and the defendant asked the court to reduce it to the amount actually paid.
The Supreme Court agreed with the defendant on that question, and it explained why in terms that still govern every case:
In one sentence: Howell measures past medical damages by the lesser of what was paid or incurred for the care and the reasonable value of that care, and it takes the written-off difference off the table.
The Mechanics
The rule sounds simple. Applying it correctly is detailed, unglamorous work, and it is the difference between a documented number and a guessed one.
Ambulance, emergency room, hospital, radiology, the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, physical therapy, the pharmacy, the specialist. Each is a separate provider with a separate billing record, and each one that is missing is money left on the table.
For each bill: what the health plan paid, what you paid in copays and deductibles, what the provider wrote off, and what remains owed. The health plan's explanation of benefits documents show the arithmetic line by line. Keep every one.
Paid amounts are recoverable. Owed amounts are recoverable. Written-off amounts are not. The Howell number is paid plus owed, and getting it exactly right matters because the defense will audit it.
Where the amount owed has not been reduced by any negotiated rate, as with lien-based treatment, the defense attacks the reasonableness of the charges. That element is proven with billing evidence and provider testimony, not assumed.
Because you can recover what your plan paid, your plan usually holds a right to be repaid from the recovery. The same is true of lien providers. These claims are identified early and negotiated at the end, because they determine what actually reaches your pocket.
Bills piling up and an adjuster quoting Howell at you? Tell us what happened.
Free Case ReviewWho Paid Matters
The same injury produces different past-medicals numbers depending on how the care was paid for. Understanding that early is part of valuing a case honestly.
Example: Driver A is rear-ended on the 210 and spends a night in the hospital with a concussion and a fractured wrist. The hospital bills $40,000. Her health plan pays $12,000 under its negotiated rate, she pays a $1,500 deductible, and the hospital writes off the remaining $26,500. Months later the other driver's adjuster says the medical claim is "really only $13,500."
Conclusion: On the past-medicals component, the adjuster is applying Howell correctly: $12,000 paid by the plan plus $1,500 paid by Driver A, or $13,500, is the recoverable past medical expense for that hospital stay, and the $26,500 write-off is not. But that is one component of one bill. It says nothing about the follow-up care, the future treatment for the wrist, the lost wages, or the human damages of a concussion that changed her for months. The adjuster's sentence is accurate about the hospital bill and misleading about the case, and the health plan's $12,000 reimbursement claim will need negotiating at the end.
Example: Driver B has no health insurance. After the same kind of crash, he treats with an orthopedic surgeon and an imaging center on liens, and the providers' charges total $60,000, none of it paid. The defense argues that "Howell caps his medicals at what was paid, which is zero."
Conclusion: That argument misreads the rule. Howell measures past medical damages by what was paid or incurred, and Driver B has incurred the full $60,000 because he owes it. The defense's real argument is about reasonable value: whether $60,000 reflects the reasonable value of the care. That is a question of proof, answered with the providers' billing records and testimony about what the services are worth, and it is where the case is actually fought. At resolution, the liens are negotiated, and the negotiation determines what Driver B takes home.
What Howell Did Not Decide
Howell decided the measure of past medical expenses. It is a rule about one component of damages. The defense routinely tries to stretch it across the whole case, and knowing where it stops is how the stretch gets answered.
The practical point is this. When an adjuster says "Howell means your case is only worth the paid amount," the adjuster has taken a rule about one component and applied it to all of them. The answer is not to argue with Howell. The answer is to build every other component so thoroughly that the past-medicals number becomes the smallest thing on the board.
Why It Cuts Both Ways
Before Howell, a case could be valued, at least roughly, by stacking up the bills. That era is over, and in an important sense that is good for the seriously injured. A case is no longer worth what a hospital's chargemaster says. It is worth what the evidence of the injury honestly supports, and evidence can be built.
That reality separates two kinds of files. The thin file has a stack of bills, a recorded statement, gaps in treatment, and nothing else; Howell shrinks its only number and the carrier's software prices it accordingly. The built file has consistent treatment, imaging, treating-physician opinions on future care, documented earnings losses, before-and-after witnesses, and a firm the carrier has seen in trial. Howell trims the past-medicals line on that file too. It does not touch the rest, and the rest is where the value is.
It also changes what happens at the end of a case. Because you recover what your plan paid, your plan wants it back, and lien providers are owed from the recovery by design. Negotiating those claims down is part of what a lawyer does in the final weeks of a case, and it directly changes the number that reaches your pocket. The gross settlement figure is not the number that matters to you. The net is. We fight for both.
The system that pays your bills while the case is pending, and who gets repaid when it ends, is explained in our article on who pays medical bills after a car accident in California. The components of value, including the multiplier myth and how claim software prices a file, are walked one at a time in what your case is actually worth.
Let us build the numbers Howell cannot shrink.
Free Case ReviewWhat You Can Do
Most of the Howell work is ours. Some of it is yours, and it starts the day of the injury.
Deadlines run on the whole case regardless of how the bills are sorted out. The general rule in California is two years from the date of injury, and far shorter, measured in months, when a public entity is involved. We explain the timelines in our article on the California personal injury lawsuit deadline, and the way we approach every injury case, car or not, is laid out in our personal injury overview.
If we don't win, you don't pay.
The consultation is free. The representation is on contingency. If there is no recovery, you owe no attorney fee.
Questions We Hear Every Week
Under Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc. (2011) 52 Cal.4th 541, an injured person's recovery for past medical expenses is measured by what was actually paid or is still owed for the care, not by the full amount the provider originally billed. When a hospital bills one number and accepts a smaller payment in full satisfaction, the written-off difference was never a loss to the patient, and California law does not award it.
Usually not, if the hospital accepted a smaller amount from your health plan as payment in full. Howell limits past medical damages to the amount paid plus any amount you still owe, capped at the reasonable value of the care. The sticker price on the bill is not the measure. What you paid, what your insurer paid, and what remains owed are.
It means the past-medicals component is measured at the paid rate, which is lower than the billed rate. It does not reduce future care, lost earnings, or the human damages for pain and disability, and in a serious case those components are where most of the value lives. Howell also preserved your right to recover what your insurer paid on your behalf, because you paid premiums for that coverage.
Differently. A patient treating on a lien has not had bills paid and written down; the patient owes the full charge, so the full charge is the amount incurred. The defense then shifts its attack to whether the charges reflect the reasonable value of the care, and that fight is won with billing evidence and provider testimony. At the end of the case, the liens themselves are negotiated, which directly changes what reaches your pocket.
Howell decided the measure of past medical expenses. Future care is a separate component, projected forward with treating physicians and life-care planning and priced at what the care is reasonably expected to cost over your life. The defense will try to import paid-rate assumptions into that projection. We build the future-care number independently, because in a serious case it is routinely the largest number on the board.
No. There is no rule in California law that sets human damages as a multiple of medical bills, and nothing in Howell creates one. Pain, disability, disfigurement, and the loss of the life you had are proven with daily-life evidence, not arithmetic on the medical ledger. Carriers use the multiplier idea because it shrinks claims. Juries award what the evidence of the injury honestly supports.
Because Howell lets you recover what your plan paid on your behalf, and most health plans hold a reimbursement right against that recovery. The claim is real and it is also negotiable, and negotiating it down at the end of the case is part of the job. The number that matters is not the gross settlement. It is what reaches you after the plan's claim and any liens are resolved.
Client Reviews
Ani A., Glendalevia Yelp"The guy who hit me had a low max coverage. I don't know what magic Vertanous Firm worked, but I got paid for my damages less than a year out from my accident, and was paid three times more than the policy limit."
Tony K., Burbankvia Yelp"Tom is the absolute best. He knows the law and he also knows medicine. One meeting with Tom and he was able to understand the medicine behind my condition and find the appropriate doctors."
Bobby S., Los Angelesvia Yelp"Tom is a straight shooter and he's whip-smart. He treated my case as though it were his own. He has a gift for compassion that sets him apart from other legal professionals."
Where We Work
From our office at 301 N. Lake Ave in Pasadena, we represent injured people across the San Gabriel Valley and all of Los Angeles County, in English, Armenian, and Farsi.
Contact
Call, text, email, or send a brief message. We respond the same day. Free consultation. No fee unless we win.
